Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1263/2009 of SULENDRA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 December 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1263 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Sulenda S/o Ranbeer @ Bhullan ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1263 of 2009
Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE
Sulenda S/o Ranbeer @ Bhullan
……….Applicant (In Jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
------- Opposite party
________________________________________________________
Arising out of Case Crime No.495 of 2009, U/Ss 379/411 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, Distt. DehradunDated: December 29, 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
Heard Sri Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the applicant and Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is in jail in the above-said offence since 7.11.2009 and no recovery of cycle was shown to be made from his possession and he has been falsely implicated due to enmity. Further, he has no criminal history before this case and the trial has yet not been started.
After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and also on perusal of other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage.
Let the applicant Sulendra be released on bail his executing personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Dehradun The bail application is allowed accordingly.
(Dharam Veer, J.)