Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/1318/2002 of RAJENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA Vs STATE and ORS. on 26 December 2007
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Ms. Anjali Noliyal, holding brief of Sri Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above statement, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All the pending applications are disposed
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Writ Petition No. 1318 (SB) of 2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.
Ms. Anjali Noliyal, holding brief of Sri Vivek Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above statement, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All the pending applications are disposed of accordingly.
(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)
26.12.2007 SKS