Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./9327/2019 of FRANCIS, Vs THE STATE OF KERALA, on 31 December 2019
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 Bail Appl..No.9327 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 2046/2019 DATED 13-12-2019 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM CRIME NO.2759/2019 OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.9327 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC 2046/2019 DATED 13-12-2019 OFDISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM
CRIME NO.2759/2019 OF Kundara Police Station , Kollam PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
FRANCIS,AGED 63 YEARSS/O.DAVID, RESIDING AT REENA VILASAM, KANJIRAKODU, MULAVANA, KUNDARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 503.
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADVS.SRI.A.JANI(KOLLAM)SMT.NISA FASIL(KOLLAM)
THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 030 (CRIME NO.2759 OF 2019 OFKUNDARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT).
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.SREEJA.V., PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Dated this the 31st day of December 2019
The petitioner had applied for anticipatorybail before the learned Principal Sessions Judge inCrime No.2759/2019 of Kundara Police Station, Kollamfor having allegedly committed offences punishableunder Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 308 read withSection 34 IPC and vide order at Annexure-A2, theanticipatory bail application was rejected.Consequent to this, the petitioner has beenarrested and remanded. The petitioner has alreadymoved the jurisdictional Magistrate's Court forregular bail and that is under consideration. Inview of the arrest of the petitioner, thisapplication for pre-arrest bail has becomeinfructuous. However, the Bail Application, if any,filed by the petitioner before the jurisdictionalMagistrate shall be considered as expeditiously aspossible and dispose of it on its merits preferably on the same day it considers.With these observations, the Bail Applicationis disposed of.
jg
Sd/-
ASHOK MENON
JUDGE