Kerala High Court
WP(C)/37732/2009 of MADHU Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ANOTHER on 30 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37732 of 2009(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- MADHU, VAZHUTHACAD, PADINJAREKARA, VALLAKOM, VAIKOM. BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 37732 of 2009(J)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
MADHU, VAZHUTHACAD, PADINJAREKARA,
VALLAKOM, VAIKOM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
VAIKOM POLICE STATION, VAIKOM.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.
BY G.P. SI. P.N. SANTHOSH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
W.P.(C) No. 37732 of 2009
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Petitioner's lorry bearing registration No.KL-7AS-9681 has beenseized by the 1[st] respondent on the allegation of unauthorized transportationof river sand, in violation of the Kerala Protection of River Banks andRegulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. The petitioner submits that he isnot guilty of any violation of the provisions of the Act and the Rules. Hehas submitted Ext.P2 application for interim custody of the vehicle. Thepetitioner seeks a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orderson Ext.P2 application for interim custody of the vehicle expeditiously.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for therespondents also.
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders onExt.P2 application for interim custody of the vehicle as expeditiously aspossible, at any rate within one week from the date of receipt of copy of this W.P.(C) No. 37732/09
judgment. The 2[nd] respondent shall also pass final orders in the matter, asper the time limit prescribed under the Act and the Rules.
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE.
Mn.