Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./10728/2011 of RAJI V.S@ RAJESWARY Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/9TH POUSHA 1933 BA.No. 10728 of 2011 ( ) CRMC.1894/2011 of DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM CRIME NO.467/2011 OF VILAPPILSALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/9TH POUSHA 1933
BA.No. 10728 of 2011 ( )
CRMC.1894/2011 of DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT, TRIVANDRUM CRIME NO.467/2011 OF VILAPPILSALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT
............
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
RAJI V.S@ RAJESWARY,
D/O.SUKUMARI AMMA,
SUJITH BHAVAN THRIVENI GARDENS,
PERINGAVU P.O.,
TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV.SRI.M.R.SARIN PANICKER
RESPONDENT(S)
STATE OF KERALA,
REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.S.ABDUL KAREEM
svs
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON30-12-2011 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P.S. GOPINATHAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
DATED THIS, THE 30[th] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Petitioner, who is the accused in Crime No. 467 of 2011 ofVilappilsala Police Station for offence under Section 420 of the IndianPenal Code, filed Crl. M.C. 1894/2011 before the Sessions Judge,Thiruvananthapuram under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedureseeking an order directing the respondent to release the petitioner on bail inthe event of her arrest. The said application was dismissed by the learnedSessions Judge as per Annexure A1 order dated 20.10.2011. Now seekingthe same relief, this application is filed.
2. Having heard either side, I find that it is appropriate to release thepetitioner on bail on condition that petitioner shall deposit the deceivedamount before the trial court.
In the result, this application is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to deposit Rs. 8,000/-(Rupees eight thousand) before the JudicialMagistrate of the First Class-II, Nedumangad and surrender before theinvestigating officer. The investigating officer, after interrogation, shallrelease the petitioner on bail on her executing bond for Rs. 20,000/- (twenty B.A. 10728/2011
thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to his satisfactionon condition that the petitioner shall report before the investigating officeras and when required. The amount in deposit shall be disbursable under theorders of the District Legal Services Authority or Taluk Legal ServicesCommittee in the event the matter is settled between the parties or under theorders of a civil court or of this Court or in final disposal of the case.
P.S. GOPINATHAN,(JUDGE)
Knc/-
The word 'Nedumangad' occurring in the third line in the lastparagraph of the order dated 30.12.2011 in B.A. 10728/2011 is correctedand substituted as 'Kattakada” vide order dated 27.2.2012 in Crl.M.A.886/2012 in B.A. 10728/2011.
Sd/-Registrar (Judicial)