Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/988/2003 of AMAR SINGH KOTIYAL and ORS. Vs STATE and ORS. on 29 December 2003
of 2003 Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Shri Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondent. Since the charge-sheet has been submitted, petition has become infructuous. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
WPMB No. 988 of 2003
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.
Heard Shri Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri D.S. Patni, Advocate for the respondent. Since the charge-sheet has been submitted, petition has become infructuous. Therefore, writ is dismissed.
Advocate for the petitioner and Shri
petition
(R.T, J.) (P.C.V., A.C, J.)
Dt. 29.12.2003. G