Kerala High Court

RP/1272/2007 of MANAGER,ST.XAVIER'S CENTRAL SCHOOL Vs STATE on 28 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH DECEMBER 2007 / 7TH POUSHA 1929 RP.No. 1272 of 2007(W) ---------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36944/2007 Dated 13/12/2007 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN

FRIDAY, THE 28TH DECEMBER 2007 / 7TH POUSHA 1929

RP.No. 1272 of 2007(W)

----------------------

AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.36944/2007 Dated 13/12/2007

....................

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER

--------------------------------------------- THE MANAGER, ST.XAVIER'S CENTRAL

SCHOOL, MANGALAM DAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678 708.

BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

--------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF GENERAL

EDUCATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT,

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

PALAKKAD.

4. THE SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF

SECONDARY EDUCATION, DELHI.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. REMANI T.B. SRI. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN -SC

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 28/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

S.SIRI JAGAN,J

=============================R.P.No.1272 of 2007 in W.P.(C).No.36944 of 2007===============================Dated this the 28[th] day of December, 2007

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

By this review petition the petitioner seeks correction ofthe judgment dated 13.12.2007 in the writ petition wherein adirection was issued to the DEO to consider the applicationsubmitted by the petitioner for No Objection Certificate inrespect of his school within two weeks. The petitioner submitsthat the DEO has already forwarded his report to the firstrespondent and it is the first respondent who is to consider theapplication for No Objection Certificate now. In the abovecircumstances, the second sentence in paragraph 2 of myjudgment would stand substituted as follows:

“Accordingly there would be a direction to the firstrespondent to consider the application submitted by thepetitioner for No Objection Certificate in respect of his school, asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment in accordance with theorders in the writ appeal referred to above.”

The review petition is disposed of as above.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead