Kerala High Court
Crl.MC/5101/2010 of ALIKUTTY Vs PARASMAL LUNNAVAT on 31 December 2010
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH POUSHA 1932 Crl.MC.No. 5101 of 2010() ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRMP 3175/2010 IN CRA.772/2010 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKOE S.T.10/2010 of Special JFCM,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
FRIDAY, THE 31ST DECEMBER 2010 / 10TH POUSHA 1932
Crl.MC.No. 5101 of 2010()
-------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRMP 3175/2010 IN CRA.772/2010 of SESSIONS COURT, KOZHIKOES.T.10/2010 of Special JFCM, (Marad Cases), Kozhikode.
....................
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/APPELLANT
--------------------------------------------------------- ALIKUTTY, S/O.MOHAMMED HAJI, THOLIKADAVATH HOUSE, ATHAVANAD P.O., THIRUNAVAYA VIA, MALAPPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS
-----------------------------------------------
1. PARASMAL LUNNAVAT S/O.PREMCHAND JAIN, PROPRIETOR, DOLPHIN FINANCE SERVICES, EKP COMPLEX, OPPOSITE PAICO, KALLAI ROAD, CALICUT REPRESENTED
BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER K.GIRISHAN,
S/O.BHASKARAN GREENS, NEAR WATER TANK,
PUTHIYARA P.O., CALICUT, PINCODE - 673 004.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. VENUGOPAL.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 31/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
P. BHAVADASAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Crl.M.C. No.5101 of 2010
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31st day of December, 2010.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is a petition filed under Section 482 of theCode of Criminal Procedure complaining about thecondition imposed by the appellate court whilesuspending execution of sentence in the appeal againstthe conviction and sentence passed by the trial court. Itis well settled that the appellate court is empowered toimpose such conditions as it deems fit, just and properwhile granting stay of execution of sentence. In the caseon hand that is all what has been done by the appellatecourt.
2. Faced with the above situation, learnedcounsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out thatsometime may be granted for depositing the amount asdirected by the court below.
Crl.M.C.5101/10.
Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase, the petitioner is given two months' time for depositing the amount as directed by the court below.
P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE
sb.