Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/15/2013 of RAM PAL and OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and OTHERS on 28 December 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 15 of 2013 Ram Pal & others … Petitioners Vs State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate, present for the petitioners Mr. T.A. Khan, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Paresh Tripathi,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 15 of 2013
Ram Pal & others
… Petitioners
Vs
State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate, present for the petitioners Mr. T.A. Khan, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Additional C.S.C., present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu, J. (Oral)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The grievance raised in the present writ petition has already decided by judgment and order dated 17.12.2013 of this Court passed in similar matter being WPMS No. 34 of 2012, in which certain directions have been given to the District Magistrate, Haridwar.
2. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Deputy Advocate General admits that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 17.12.2013 passed in WPMS No. 34 of 2012.
3. In view of the above, as the present writ petitioners are similarly placed as in the writ petitioners in the above writ petition, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as in the WPMS No. 34 of 2012.
4. For the reasons as discussed above, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
28.12.2013 Aswal
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)