Kerala High Court
WP(C)/41918/2017 of P.L.VARGHESE Vs THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 41918 of 2017 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- P.L.VARGHESE AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939WP(C).No. 41918 of 2017 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):------------- P.L.VARGHESE M/S. FASHION WOOD INDUSTRIES, KIDANGOOR P.O, ANGAMALY 683 591.
AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. LOUIZ, PROPRIETOR,
BY ADVS.SRI.K.A.JALEEL SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, 682 031. 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANGAMALY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, 683 572.
3. JOHNY P.O S/O.OUSEPH, PAREKKATTIL HOUSE, PULIYANAM P.O, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM 683 572.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANU RAJ K.J.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 41918 of 2017 (L)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE LICENSE DATED 31.5.17 ISSUED BY THE 3RDRESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2. COPY OF THE CERTIICATE DATED 30.03.93 ISSUED BY THEDEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.
EXHIBIT P3. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 19.12.17 SUBMITTED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITSNIL----------------------- //True Copy//
PS to Judge
A.M. SHAFFIQUE & ASHOK MENON, JJ.
===========================W.P(C) No.41918 of 2017
==================
Dated this, the 29[th] day of December, 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J.
Petitioner has approached this Court alleging that petitioner isnot permitted to operate his wood industry though he has all validlicence/permission from the competent authorities. It is alleged thatthe 3[rd] respondent had obstructed the movement of vehicles.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the 3[rd] respondentsubmitted that vehicular movement was obstructed since a lorryhad caused damage to the overhead electric line and there was nopower connection for about three days. Now that the power line hadbeen restored, they do not have any intention to create anyobstruction as such.
3. Learned Government Pleader on instructions wouldsubmit that, as matters stand now, there is no obstruction to thefree movement of vehicle to petitioner's premises.
WP(C) No.41918/17
-:2:-
4. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, we donot think that any further direction is required in the matter.However, if there is any further obstruction, it shall be open forthe petitioner to prefer a complaint to the police, who shall lookinto the matter and do the needful.
Writ petition is closed with the above observation.
Rp
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
Sd/-
ASHOK MENON, JUDGE
//True Copy//
PS to Judge