Kerala High Court
Crl.MC/8950/2017 of RENJITH Vs STATE OF KERALA on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 Crl.MC.No. 8950 of 2017 () --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 708/2017 of SPL.C IDAMALAYAR INVN & 5 ADDL.DC.EKM DATED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 8950 of 2017 ()
---------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 708/2017 of SPL.C IDAMALAYAR INVN& 5 ADDL.DC.EKM DATED
PETITIONER/9TH ACCUSED:
-------------------------
RENJITH
AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, ARACKAL HOSUE, RAJAKKAD P.O., CHERUPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
--------------
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.KAMAPPU.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., J
-----------------------------------
Crl.M.C.No.8950 of 2017
-----------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2017
O R D E R~~~~~~
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner herein is the 9[th] accused in S.C.No.708 of 2017on the files of the V Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam. Itappears that on his failure to appear before the court below,non-bailable warrants have been issued. His prayer is to issuenecessary directions to the learned Sessions Judge to recall thewarrant issued against him and to grant him bail. on the files of the V Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam. Itappears that on his failure to appear before the court below,non-bailable warrants have been issued. His prayer is to issuenecessary directions to the learned Sessions Judge to recall thewarrant issued against him and to grant him bail.
2. The reasons which persuaded the Court below to issue non-bailable warrants of arrest is not clearly discernible from thepetition filed. Even otherwise, this Court will not be justified ininterfering with the discretion exercised by the learnedSessions Judge. The petitioner has no other option but tosurrender before the court below and seek regular bail. bailable warrants of arrest is not clearly discernible from thepetition filed. Even otherwise, this Court will not be justified ininterfering with the discretion exercised by the learnedSessions Judge. The petitioner has no other option but tosurrender before the court below and seek regular bail.
3. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed ofdirecting the petitioner to surrender before the learneddirecting the petitioner to surrender before the learned Crl.M.C.No.8950/2017
Sessions Judge within a period of seven days from today andmove appropriate applications for recall of warrant and grant ofbail. If such applications are filed, the same shall be consideredand disposed of by the Court below expeditiously and on itsmerits.
SD/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.,
JUDGE
ps/29/12/2017