Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38137/2008 of SUNIL DAS Vs THE DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT on 26 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38137 of 2008(M) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------- 1. SUNIL DAS, LAB ATTENDER, MOBILE SOIL TESTING LAB, AGRICULTURE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 38137 of 2008(M)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------
1.SUNIL DAS, LAB ATTENDER, MOBILE SOIL TESTING LAB,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR.
2.SURESH KUMAR.C.N., LAB ATTENDER, STATEBIO CONTROL LAB,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT,MANNUTHY, THRISSUR DT.
3.NARAYANANKUTTY, LAB ATTENDER, STATE BIO CONTROL LAB,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT,MANNUTHY, THRISUR DT.
4.JOSHY N.J, VEHICLE CLEANER, MOBILE SOIL TESTING LAB,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR.
5.SAJEEVAN K.B. DUPLICATING MACHINE OPERATOR,PRINCIPLE AGRICULTURE OFFICE,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR.
6.SHANTO KUNNATHUPARAMBIL, TRACTOR CLEANER,ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEERING OFFICE,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR.
7.BHAVADASAN T.B., PEON, STATE SEED FARM,NADAVARAMBA, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DT.
8.STEPHAN A.O, ATTENDER,AGRICULTURAL URBAN WHOLE SALE MARKET,AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, MARADU, NETTOOR,ERNAKULAM DT.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------
THE DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
GOVT.PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
==============
W.P.(C) NO. 38137 OF 2008 (M)
====================
Dated this the 26[th]day of December, 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Claim of the petitioners, who are low paid employees of the Agricultural Department, is to be considered for the post ofAgricultural Assistant. It is stated that in terms of the Special Rules,they are entitled to get by transfer appointment as AgriculturalAssistant. Petitioners submit that when Ext.P1 notifications wereissued, they were not qualified and therefore they could not apply forthe post. However, according to them, on acquiring the prescribedqualifications, in view of the availability of vacancies, they havesubmitted Exts.P2 to P8 before the respondents, claiming by transferappointment. In this writ petition they complaint that theirrepresentations have not been considered and seeks an order for theconsideration of their representations.
2. In view of the facts as stated above, I direct therespondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 to P8, if theserepresentations have been received and are pending.
In view of the facts as stated above, I direct the :2 :
3. Orders shall be passed as expeditiously as possible at any rate within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of this petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Rp
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE