Kerala High Court
WP(C)/35947/2019 of RASHEED Vs THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, on 31 December 2019
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.35947 OF 2019(P) PETITIONER: RASHEED AGED 51 YEARS KUZHIKKANDATHIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKAD.P.O., MUNDUMUZHI, MALAPPURAM. BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENT:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941WP(C).No.35947 OF 2019(P)
PETITIONER:
RASHEEDAGED 51 YEARSKUZHIKKANDATHIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKAD.P.O., MUNDUMUZHI, MALAPPURAM.
RESPONDENT:
BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, DOWN HILL, MALAPPURAM-676505.
SMT. MABLE C KURIAN, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31st day of December 2019
Petitioner is an existing stage carriage operator on the route Kozhikode-Areacode in respect of the stage carriage bearing No.KL 10 AR 1644. Petitioner isoperating the said vehicle with effect from 6.12.2013.
2. The petitioner has averred that due to other services on the route and unhealthy competition, greatinconvenience is being caused to the travelling public.Hence, the petitioner had submitted Ext.P1 applicationbefore the respondent seeking for revision of timings.Petitioner seeks an expeditious disposal of Ext.P1application. He has relied on Ext.P2 judgment passed bythis Court.
3. Heard Sri.Stalin Peter Davis, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Mable C. Kurian, learnedGovernment Pleader.
4. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P1
application is pending before the respondent since23.12.2019, I deem it appropriate, in exercise of thejurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, to direct the respondent toconsider Ext.P1 application as expeditiously as possible, atany rate, within a period six weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording thepetitioner and all other affected parties operating on theroute an opportunity of being heard.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23.12.2019, ALONG WITH ACCEPTANCE RECEIPT.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.34674/2019 DATED 18.12.2019.