Kerala High Court
Crl.MC/3407/2012 of JOSE CHACKO Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 Crl. MC. No. 3407 of 2012 () -------------------------- (CRIME NO.970 OF 2011 OF AMBALAPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT) (OS NO.71/2010 of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
Crl. MC. No. 3407 of 2012 ()
--------------------------
(CRIME NO.970 OF 2011 OF AMBALAPUZHA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT)
(OS NO.71/2010 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA)
PETITIONER)/2ND ACCUSED:
-----------------------
JOSE CHACKO, AGED 48 YEARS,
S/O. C.V. CHACKO, VALAPPURAKKAL VEEDU
PACHA, CHEKKIDIKKAD P.O., EDATHUA
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI. S. SANAL KUMAR
SMT. BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN SMT. T.J. SEEMA
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & DEFACTOCOMPLAINANT :
--------------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. PHUMEN SINGH,
AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. GARBACHAN SINGH, V-MIANI
DHILWAN P.O., KABOORTHALA DISTRICT, PANJAB-144804.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. RAJESH VIJAYAN
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl. MC. No. 3407 of 2012 ()
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
---------------------------------------
Crl. M.C. No.3407 OF 2012
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the Crl.M.C without prejudice to the right of thepetitioner to challenge the final report. Permission as above isgranted and this Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJUDGE
smp