Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/758/2010 of MOHAN RAM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND and ORS. on 31 December 2010
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION NO. 758 OF 2010 (S/S) Mohan Ram …………Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand and others. ………Respondents. Present: Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
WRIT PETITION NO. 758 OF 2010 (S/S)
Mohan Ram
…………Petitioner.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others.
………Respondents.
Present:Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging his suspension order. However, learned counsel for the petitioner while arguing this case has confined his case to the payment of subsistence allowance.
3. Admittedly, subsistence allowance is liable to be paid to a government employee under suspension, but during the period of suspension, subsistence allowance was not given to the petitioner. Therefore, the respondent no. 2 is directed to immediately give the subsistence allowance to the petitioner along with entire arrears, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, the instant writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
Rathour