Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/174/2009 of MOH. UMAR AND ORS Vs STATE AND ORS on 31 December 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. None is present for the petitioner. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners No.1-Mohd. Umar, no.4-Hazi Moh. Yusuf, no.5-Aalam and no.6-Nazim
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPCRL No.174/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
None is present for the petitioner. Sri M.A. Khan, learned brief holder for the State, who makes a statement that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners No.1-Mohd. Umar, no.4-Hazi Moh. Yusuf, no.5-Aalam and no.6-Nazim while the petitioners No.2-Rubi and no.3-Smt. Noorjanan have not been charge sheeted. Averment to this effect has also been made in paragraph no.2 of the counter affidavit filed by the I.O.
In view of the above development, the writ petition has now become infructuous. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous with the observation that interim order dated 09.04.2009 passed by this Court shall remain in operation till the police report is received by the court concerned.
(D.V., J.) 31.12.2009
Rajeev Dang