Kerala High Court

AS/19/1954 of PEERUBAVA IBRAHIM OF INCHAKKATTIL Vs CHACKO JOSEPH on 18 October 1955

COURT OF TEE STA±E OP RAVANCO-COCII A BAK7JAM. \ I 'i ­ Present:- -w.I1he Hon•ble Shri K.T. oshi, gief Justice and The Hon'ble Sh.ri P.D. Nandana Ivienon, Judge. ' ,A.S. No. 19 of 1954. o.s.no. 73 of 1118 on the .file of the Dist.rict Gou.rt, K0ttayam, pending execution in tlle

IN THHIGH COURT OF TEE STA±E OP RAVANCO-CO CII A BAK7JAM.

Present:-

-w.I1he Hon•ble Shri K.T. oshi, gief Justice

and

The Hon'ble Sh.ri P.D.Nandana Ivienon, Judge.

' ,A.S.No. 19 of 1954.

o.s.no. 73 of 1118 on the.file of the Dist.rictGou.rt,K0ttayam,pending execution in tlle Temp.Addl.District Court,Parur.

•

Appellant:- 8th de.f'endant.

-

\I'i

Pee:rubava Ibrahim of InchaJ:r,.lcattil,Udumbarmoor Kal'a,1{8..rimannoo.rPakuthy,Thod upuzha • Talul.:.

By Advocate Sh.ri IT.D.Pa.rameswa.ran lJamboo1~ipad.

Bes nondents :- Assignee Dec.rec-holde.r IO.riginal dec.ree-holde.r anddefendants 1,3 to 7,9 and 1o.

1. Cha elm Joseph,Pa.rethazhathu,Pannoo.ru l!Ju.ri,Ka.rimam100.r Pauly,Thodupuzha aluk.

Reoved off fro t.he array.,,.,.

3. AviraOuseh 'ofLAoottoo.ru,Udumbannooru l(a.ra, iCa.rirnannoo.rPakuy,ThodupazhaTalul.(died).Pakuy,ThodupazhaTalul.(died).

d. akaru Pariyath of Platchottathil, do.do.

5 •Avira Chacko of Mottoo.ru, do.do.

6. Ouseph Anna of do.do.

7. Ouse_ph- Agasthy Alias Kunjukutty of' do.

8. Ouseph Sosa .residintc in Sanlr.a.ramulr.athu, do.

Page 1 of 3

9. Sankara Pillai irisina Pillai of Paclistva, UdunbannooruMuri,. Karimannoor Pal:uthy.Muri,. Karimannoor Pal:uthy.

10. Ouseph Kariacko of Kottaepa.rambil,do.do.

3rd Respondent died Legal heirs:-

ll.Ouseph raham of undooru Udapanoor Kara,KaruannoorPalrnthy.Palrnthy.

12. ·ousepl:1 .Joseph of do.

13. Ouseph Jacob of' do.

14. Ouseph ate of do.

(Lfi.no.r).--(LTino.r).LTino.r).Tino.r).ino.r).no.r).o.r)..r).)..

15. Ouseph Kurian of do.

lo.Ouseph Thomas of do.(LTino.r).LTino.r).Tino.r).ino.r).no.r).o.r)..r).)..

Guardian of mino.r res;;ondents 15 and 16 is thei.r mothe.r,6threspondent,Ouseph Amma -Ca use title ts amended as per o.rde.ron C.ii.P.643/55 dated c-9-1955.By Advocate Shri i..Varghese forRespondent l.

This.i\ppeal Suit having been finally heard on l8-l0-l955, this cou.rt on the same day delivered the following:- Of the.two points raised in the appeal the complaint that the-'lower courts o.rde.r cont.ravens the prov-isions of the decree that item.«•4 should be sold last has no substance.here is now only ad i.rectionIt•tRto proclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.ro proclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r proclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rroclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.roclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rlaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.raim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rm items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rtems 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rems 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rms 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rs 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rd 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rd that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rhat does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rat does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rt does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.res not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rs not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rot m¢ean the o.rder fo.rt m¢ean the o.rder fo.r m¢ean the o.rder fo.r¢ean the o.rder fo.rean the o.rder fo.ran the o.rder fo.rn the o.rder fo.r the o.rder fo.rhe o.rder fo.re o.rder fo.r o.rder fo.r.rder fo.rder fo.rer fo.rr fo.r fo.ro.r.r

to proclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.ro proclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r proclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rroclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.roclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rclaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rlaim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.raim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rim items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rm items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r items 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rtems 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rems 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rms 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rs 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r 4, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r, 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r 8 and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r and 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rd 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r 9, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r, and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r and that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rd that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r that does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rhat does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rat does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rt does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r does not m¢ean the o.rder fo.res not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rs not m¢ean the o.rder fo.r not m¢ean the o.rder fo.rot m¢ean the o.rder fo.rt m¢ean the o.rder fo.r m¢ean the o.rder fo.r¢ean the o.rder fo.rean the o.rder fo.ran the o.rder fo.rn the o.rder fo.r the o.rder fo.rhe o.rder fo.re o.rder fo.r o.rder fo.r.rder fo.rder fo.rer fo.rr fo.r fo.ro.r.r sale prescribed by the decree will not be observed~

Page 2 of 3

-s for the discbarge of Rs. 700/. as per B:x:t. II we a.re -afraid the lower court's 'vie that ts.C'and Cl stand in the• way of the question of adjustment bein.g .reagitated has to be upheld1n spite of our p.r6nounced opinion that the ·assignment- of the decree and the atte:·2pt of the assignee to execute. the detcree for the whole amount is a sheer abuse of the process df the court.

The appeal is hen'ce di~jHJissed, but withoutcosts.',,.·Sd/-C;J,Sd/-P.'D.Nandana ienon, a.j 13-10-1955.'

"(rue Copy).

a=,DY.H.egist.ra.r,r·or Regist.ra.r.

-AF/17xi-55.. A.S. Ho. 19 of 1954.Copy of Judgment.

Jil

i:

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead