Kerala High Court
CMA/19/2003 of SAMINA NASAREEN HASSAN Vs C.SUDHA on 3 April 2003
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2003 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1925 CMA.No. 19 of 2003() -------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/12/2002 IN OS.42/2002 IN IA.367/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 3RD APRIL 2003 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1925
CMA.No. 19 of 2003()
--------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/12/2002 IN OS.42/2002 IN
IA.367/2002 of ADL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY
....................
APPELLANT: PETITIONER
---------------------
SAMINA NASREN HASSAN, W/O. SYED MARAJUL
HASSAN, AGED 31 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/ANO.4,WALKER
LANE,LANGFORD TOWN,BANGALORE-25, REP. THROUGH
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHYAM KUMAR,
S/O. P.MUKUNDAN, AGED 30 YEARS, NO OCCPATION, R/A
IN VEENA VIHAR, CHALAD AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR TALUK
BY ADV. SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT
-----------------------
SMT. C.SUBHA, D/O. KRISHNAN NAIR,
AGED 34 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, RESIDING AT
PINARAYI AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.E.V.NAYANAR
SMT.VIDHYA. A.C
THIS CIVIL MISC. APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 11/6/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Kurian Joseph & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C.M.A.NO.19 of 2003
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of June, 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Kurian Joseph, J.
This appeal is filed against the order dated 8.1.2003 in I.A.No.1402/2002 in O.S. No.237/2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Palakkadwhereby the court refused to continue the interim injunction and dismissedthe petition. It is seen from the order that the court below has proceeded onthe basis that the suit is one for injunction and that the plaintiffs have notfiled any suit for partition. We are afraid that the court below has notproperly adverted to the nature of the suit. It is seen from the plaint that thesuit is one for partition simplicitor. Therefore, it is not necessary for thiscourt at this stage to go into the various contentions taken by the appellantincluding the contention based on Section 90 of the Indian Trust Act sincethe matter, in our view, requires reconsideration.
Accordingly, we set aside the order under challenge and remit thematter to the court below for fresh consideration.
(Kurian Joseph, Judge.)
(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)
-2-
Kurian Joseph & T.R. Ramachandran Nair, JJ. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -C.M.A.NO.19 of 2003
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
11th day of June, 2007