Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/1598/2004 of VIRENDRA LAL Vs STATE and ORS. on 24 December 2004
(SS) 2004 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel, who has accepted notices on behalf of respondents. Both the parties are agreed to decide the writ petition at its admission stage itself. By means of this
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel, who has accepted notices on behalf of respondents.
Both the parties are agreed to decide the writ petition at its admission stage itself.
By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed to issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order dated 27.7.2004 by which the services of petitioner has been terminated by SSP, Haridwar.
Petitioner has alternative remedy by way of appeal, which he can avail.
Consequently, writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.
24.12.2004 S.K.S
(M.M. Ghildiyal, J.)