AS/54/1954 of NEELACANTAN NAIR NARAYANAN NAIR Vs SANKARAN GOVINDAN on 18 November 1958

1. Neelacantn Eir arayenan Iai; oz Raheced»,Llavu±attu muri, Pclamel Paluthy,ii;liraraalul2. Lakslm1i Am.ma Bi1arathii',:WJ.1s.. of do.do.

Respondents - 1'lf'fs& Deft~1,16,18 to 26,28 & L.R.of deceased ~7th 0£.1- do.(died;

2. Kunju· Peri..1111. :2a.r""-rathi of'

do.

do.uo.

~ .:rurvathi Ne.rayu.n.i of

do.do.

4. i'-o"t:rindan Kesavnn of

5. Sai---il.::ar~n Sankaran·of do•. residing :1t V£:.zhs1..11pallilKiz?kl:ohil,do. uri (died)

6 ..Kc;.liarnnia l\fare.yani of Karinjamatta-t;hu" 1>uthen "IJ\e,edu, Panayil mu):'iyil, do. Pa..lt"uthy 7 .Paro...11eswa.ran fiee'is..can :,an of

cl.o •dQ.

do.J?illat ofdo.do.do.

8. Parvathy Kochikl;:a. of -

"9 ..Riman ?illai Ragha.van

10. Kochikka Dharc~&Wi of

11. Raman Pillai Sankara Pillai of

do.

12. sn Pi!igi nrgavan Zillai o£do.13.R_aman·Pillai1taw.~ishna:f rilla.i ci' do do.

(died)

14. Rgghavan Pillai Sivara.ma Pillai of do.

15. Chirutha Thevi 0f Thara;yil VEi-zhap1)al1i Kizhakkethi1,1~rur.1akuzhi Huri{ died)tt.

16. Sankarn.n Kunju l)illai uritten as Kunjecn of do.

17. Ja.na.ki ii.mma- Ooma..._--ia Arna ofdo.{minor)~18 .Janaki Amoa Sanhs..wmr.. ofdo.(rninor)

19 .Soman nephew of' Kunju:Pillai fo do. (minor)

2o.Kunju Pillai Sulzmaran of do. (minor)

'"'5:Jt ith'1 R Inx.eesspptt.• v dii·ea'lde - 01 N°-::..1pc~;r ,e :WJ..~-·-~~-x.;t'<-b.;"e,.1- • i..,,.·m,.p1 rl(_: • he ra:.• l/d '.Jed-c- '<'J- a i"na tt- ohc.'le p1 ~~-l iac~ 1 - 5e o4.•f the deceasedV(J?.T.O.)

2nd Respt .. died - Respts.1;3 & 4 are legal representatives of the--deceased 2nd respt4. vide order on C.M.P,989/56 dated 11956.

Minor._17 to20 are rep1"'esented by the fathor and gu~rdian KochukrishnaKurup~ Ka.lalil Puthen veedu, Eruma.ku.zhi Muri,J?alamel village,vide c.rl.P.1237/55.·

1st kespt. Ey Ai7ocate±ir.K.Jaarayanan Nair 1th Re.spt. Ey Advocate i'lr.H.?.Ra.ma.kr-ishna Pillai &11['-· :.·:r.Achutha t:irrier 1$th Respt. By Advocate i-1r.:.,:i.Krishnar; Nair17th to20ti1 Ze;;;pt o By i·1r. :(.·relayudhan Nair This, Apeal havig been hear& en 18-1 i-1958, the cour·t onthe same day delivered.·c:~s follo·v:ing:- representatives of thG deceased second defendant,againstthe decreeof the lower cour negativingcir rights o gc the share of hesecoad defendant in le sui& proper5ies ,r;o .in any very greatdetail as'[e][ h][a][v][e][ o].·[x][l][r]~[ t][o] i[n][d][ o][u][t]heter thesecond defendan-t has•.,a s0par00 shars es a eatitled to a share- in his individual right,which could be passed o:_1 to his J.egal represent.-Jtives, viz.,,Ghe .Luring tho ar2,1.t'TI.cnts of t•his case before us, it has..been brought to our no·~~ic~- that the second defendan;ii died longbefore the filin;:; of the·,1ritten statement by the1st defendan.t.If that is so, ho ri;cs sf the 2ad defendsin the pro pcrties'had already lapsed to the1 ;;1t dcfcndant and there was~1othir1;s thatho app0llats couldct as[r][e].[r:]-·[r][c]/[s][e][n][t][a][t][i][v][e][;][3][ o][f][ t][h][e][ s][e][c][o][n][d][ d][e][f][e][n][d][a][r][r][t,]because he was notentitled. to:.:3.ll;l separate sh0,re as s'J.Ch fromthe writ·ten statCf.J.cnt uf 1st defcnda.:1t has bocn'filed on B-12-1114 ..'.In this view it is unnccessr~rY for us to consider the argument ofMr.Potti, as.to whether the 1st defendant had d~lcared hin intentionto· sepG.rate in :b..is· written sta--~e1n·-;-•mt filed.·, _! .,, -This appeal fa.ils--~.cl:f$' dism.issed.; but without anyorder as to costs.-lJ ~- /J- S1(M, S.iienon, JudgeC. A., Vaidialinga.m, Ju.dge.$ .S aa @::z.~· ,,r,_A_._sst.Reg~istrar.----·--·- -----·- CGLt-