Kerala High Court
WP(C)/27797/2012 of HYDROSE Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C). No. 27797 of 2012 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- HYDROSE, AGED 60 YEARS S/O. PEERU MOHAMMED 23-26, FABSA MANZIL, BEACH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
WP(C). No. 27797 of 2012 (Y)--------------------------- PETITIONER:---------- HYDROSE, AGED 60 YEARS S/O. PEERU MOHAMMED 23-26, FABSA MANZIL, BEACH ROAD, THENGAPATTANAM.P.O., TAMILNADU.
BY ADV. SRI. SAJU. S.A
RESPONDENTS:
-----------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE FORT POLICE STATION, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 016 FORT POLICE STATION, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 016
4. SHAFI, S/O. KHAN SAHIB, T.C. 41/1594, KALIPPANKULAM MANAKKAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 018. S/O. KHAN SAHIB, T.C. 41/1594, KALIPPANKULAM MANAKKAD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 018.
R1 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. P.A. VIJAYA RAGHAVAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.27797 OF 2012
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after thepassing of the interim order dated 12.12.2012, the Police haveregistered a crime.
2. Heard the learned State Attorney. It is submitted thatthe matter has become infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJUDGE
smp