Kerala High Court

WP(C)/35970/2019 of ASHRAF K Vs THE SECRETARY, on 31 December 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.35970 OF 2019(U) PETITIONER: ASHRAF K AGED 54 YEARS S/O. MAHAMOOD M. M., DARUL THANEEM, PUZHATHIL, KOTTALI, KANNUR. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT: THE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941WP(C).No.35970 OF 2019(U)

PETITIONER:

ASHRAF KAGED 54 YEARSS/O. MAHAMOOD M. M., DARUL THANEEM, PUZHATHIL, KOTTALI, KANNUR.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS

RESPONDENT:

THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR, PIN - 670 002

SMT. PRINCY XAVIER, GP

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of December 2019

Petitioner is an existing stage carriage operator on the route Kannur-Thalassery in respect of the stage carriage beaing No.KL 59 N 1574 as evidence by Ext.P1.

2. According to the petitioner, due to the increasing number of services and heavy traffic block on the route, the petitioner is not in a position to conduct the services properly. Hence the petitioner has made Ext.P2

request for revision of timings. The application is pending consideration before the respondent since 19.12.2019.

3. Heard Sri.O.D.Sivadas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Princy Xavier, the learned GovernmentPleader for the respondent.

Having regard to the fact that the petitioner had submitted Ext.P2 application seeking revision of timings ofthe above number of vehicle, I deem it appropriate todirect the respondent to consider and pass appropriateorders on Ext.P2 application after affording thepetitioner and other similarly affected persons in the saidroute within a period of six weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

ACM/31.12.2019

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1

TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 8.10.2013.

EXHIBIT P2

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 19.12.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead