Kerala High Court
WP(C)/37724/2009 of BIJO JOSEPH Vs STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS on 30 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37724 of 2009(I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------ BIJO JOSEPH, VETTUVAYALIL, AMBARANIRAPPEL.P.O,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 37724 of 2009(I)
------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
BIJO JOSEPH, VETTUVAYALIL,
AMBARANIRAPPEL.P.O, CHITTANIKKARA,
BHARANANGANAM.
BY ADV. MR.GIKKU JACOB
MR.B.H.MANZOOR
RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.
4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR,
K.S.R.T.C,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.NOBLE MATHEW
R4 BY ADV. MR.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
W.P.(C) No. 37724 of 2009
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is the claimant in O.P.(MV) No.854 of 2003 before theMotor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pala. Ext.P1 award has been passed inthat claim petition, awarding compensation to the petitioner. His grievancein this writ petition is that despite issue of Ext.P2 revenue recoverycertificate by the Tribunal, respondents 2 and 3 are not taking appropriatesteps to recover the amount covered by Ext.P1 award.
2. Learned standing counsel for the 4[th] respondent who is the ownerof the vehicle involved in the accident, which led to Ext.P1 award, submitsthat the amount would be deposited before the Tribunal within threemonths.
This submission is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of.
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE.