Kerala High Court
WP(C)/37719/2009 of SUMI K Vs THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY on 30 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37719 of 2009(H) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S): ------------------------- 1. SUMI.K, D/O. MOHAMMED.K, AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 37719 of 2009(H)
------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------
1. SUMI.K, D/O. MOHAMMED.K,
AGED 23 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOLADIKKAL HOUSE, KOLOLAMBA.P.O, EDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. S. SHYAMA, D/O. K. SELVARAJ,
AGED 23 YEARS, GOWRIRAJ BHAVANAM,
EDAYAR STREET 3, MANKAVU, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. MR.T.MADHU
RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------
1. THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,
UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT,
OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. MR.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
W.P.(C) No. 37719 of 2009
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Petitioners in this writ petition are students who appeared for theFifth Semester and Third Semester Supplementary Examination for B.TechMechanical Engineering Degree course conducted in December, 2008 bythe 1[st] respondent University. Dissatisfied with their results in theexamination, they submitted Exts.P1 and P2 applications for revaluation oftheir answer papers. They seek expeditious completion of the revaluationprocess.
2. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the Universityalso.
3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, I dispose of this writpetition with a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluationprocess, for which the petitioners have submitted Exts.P1 and P2applications, and publish results thereof as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment, provided the applications are in order in all respects.
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE.
Mn.