Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1178/2002 of INDER SINGH and ORS. Vs STATE on 20 November 2002
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 20th day of November ,2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number. 1178 of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Inder Singh Negi s/o Beer Singh Negi, r/o village Nagani Patti, Khatli, Tehsil Thailisain, at
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 20th day of November ,2002
Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number. 1178 of 2002
Order on the Bail Application
CRIMINAL SIDE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(1) Inder Singh Negi s/o Beer Singh Negi, r/o village Nagani Patti, Khatli, Tehsil Thailisain, at present R/o A-172, Swantantra Bharat Mill Colony, P.S. Motinagar, New Delhi, (2) Ravindra Nath Sharma s/o Madan Gopal, r/o A-177, Swatrantra Bharat Mill at present R/o A-172, Swantantra Bharat Mill Colony, P.S. Motinagar, New Colony, P.S. Motinagar, New Delhi, (3) Deopal Yadav s/o Desh Raj Yadav, r/o Thana Kumd, Teeta Dungra, District Rewari, Haryana, (4) Jai Bhagwan s/o Joge Ram, r/o RZ- 202, Gopal Nagar, B-Block, Nazafgarh, New Delhi (5) Naresh Kumar s/o Sawat Singh, r/o Kuddivawal, Kishangarh, Thana, Kot Kasian, District Alwar (Rajasthan) and (6) Narendra Singh s/o Prem Singh, r/o Madala, Thana Loni, District Ghaziabad, (UP)
……….………………..Applicant(s)
Versus
State of Uttaranchal. ……………………Opposite Party.
Arising out of- Case Crime No. 628 of 2002, Under sectioin 3 of the U.P. Gangsters & Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Satpuli, District Pauri Garhwal By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Additional Government Advocate.
There is only one criminal case each pending against the applicants-accused. There is no previous conviction to the credit of the applicants and considering this fact, there are reasonable grounds to accept at this stage the argument that the applicants have not committed the offence and there is no likelihood of their involving themselves in similar activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail.
activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case Let the applicants (1) Inder Singh Negi s/o Beer Singh Negi, r/o village Nagani Patti, Khatli, Tehsil Thailisain, at present R/o A-172, Swantantra Bharat Mill Colony, P.S.
Motinagar, New Delhi, (2) Ravindra Nath Sharma s/o Madan Gopal, r/o A-177, Swatrantra Bharat Mill Colony, P.S. Motinagar, New Delhi, (3) Deopal yadav s/o Desh Raj yadav, r/o Thana Kumd, Teeta Dungra, District Rewari, Haryana, (4) Jai Bhagwan s/o Joge Ram, r/o RZ- 202, Gopal Nagar, B-Block, Nazafgarh, New Delhi (5) Naresh Kumar s/o Sawat Singh, r/o Kuddivawal, Kishangarh, Thana, Kot Kasian, District Alwar (Rajasthan) and (6) Narendra Singh s/o Prem Singh, r/o Madala, Thana Loni, District Ghaziabad, (UP) be released on bail in case crime no.628 of 2002, Under sectioin 3 of the U.P. Gangesters & Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Satpuli, District Pauri Garhwal on their each filing a personal bond and adequate sureties each to satisfaction of Special Judge, Dehradun.
20.11.02/B. MPS
(Irshad Hussain, J.)
Corrected vide Court’s order dated 26.11.02 Passed on Correction Application no. 575/02. (Irshad Hussain, J.)