Kerala High Court
AS/2/1951 of SAID MOHAMMED ROWTHER Vs AYYAPPAN SANKU PANICKER on 16 February 1951
house,. £om UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry, @uilon Pakuth1. , .· , _. ' · • .::;·; - ... ,f '"; ,. By Advocate Sri.T.K.Na.rayana Pillai This_~ppeal suit having been heard on 16-2-1951, the on the same day delivered the following:-,, '
In the High Court of Travancore-Cochin
., Before
'Their Lordships The· Hon ble I¼r.Justice K.S. Govinda Pillai andThe Hon'ble lir.Just&ice K..Gana@hara MenonA.S.2 of1951
'O.S.253 of 1124, (Execution) of ,the.Quilon District Court -Appellant - defena,a,nt:
VSaid Mohammed Rowther,. Navak_kannu Rother residing near '
~u.ravanpalam, Asramathueig.er.ry f'.ro1? Madappalli Purayidom_, Vada- kkun;ibhag~Cher.ry,.Quilon Pakuthi.4stt V
_By Advocate Si.T.J;C.• .Toseph
· Res-oondent -a.o Decre?e-holder;I-
\
at. Kottappurathu house,.
Ayy«a"ppan Sfank"u' Panic•kar residingom UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,m UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry, UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,pil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,il, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,l, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,1akkov1l±± Cherry,akkov1l±± Cherry,kkov1l±± Cherry,ov1l±± Cherry,v1l±± Cherry,1l±± Cherry,l±± Cherry, Cherry,erry,rry,ry,y,,,.· ,_.·•.::;·; -...,f'"; £om UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,m UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry, UTZ1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,1P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,P1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,1ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,ppil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,pil, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,il, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,l, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry, Ul1akkov1l±± Cherry,1akkov1l±± Cherry,akkov1l±± Cherry,kkov1l±± Cherry,ov1l±± Cherry,v1l±± Cherry,1l±± Cherry,l±± Cherry, Cherry,erry,rry,ry,y,,@uilon Pakuth1.
,.By Advocate Sri.T.K.Na.rayana Pillai
This_~ppeal suit having been heard on 16-2-1951, the on the same day delivered the following:-,,
.Judgment
Page 1 of 2
• ••.i. +-·',.. ·· /fh~· .;udgment-debtor is the appellant. He hadjor J:950 before the DistrictCourt,Quilon under sec.16 of theActs. That is now p_ending in the Second Jucl.ge' s .Cou:rt .A Reappointed by that court~s now in possession of all his proper-ties. The decree· in question is pendin_g execution before the 'District Judge at that station.Vfuen the pr~ies came up forsale, the judgment-debtor applied for stay of execution as he"":_Jhad already filed the D.R.Act petiti011~ till the disposal of~.~.J...that petition or for four months to find out money to discha.rge-a-ppealed a.g.ains....--·,Vhen the. foe~ that· the properties in ques;ion were in th~ (posE)ession of a Rece:i..Jle.r appointed by the Second Judge wals· i':brought· to tht! notice of the District Jp_dge,who was executing4the decree-agai:q.s.tthe appellant he should have d;irected for?iobtaining the sanction of the Gecond Judge to·p.roceed againstthe properties. Till that is done he is not to sell the proper--ties. The petition of .the· ,judgment-debtor should have been .;•.
t
/2.I
Iallowed· as indicated above. In this appeal we direct theexecution court to proceed against the properties onlyafter obtaining sanction of the Second Judge who bad takenpossession of the p.ro-pertie s by appointing a- Receiver.· Hisrefusal to stay the e'xecution of the 'present decree, in theD_.R •.Act proceedings will not in the circumstances of thiscase amount to the implied sanction to execute the decree~- against tne properties of- the judgment-debtor whenthey are in the possession of his Receiver.The order ofthe lower court is set aside and tb1s appeal allowed to the·4extent indicated above.· We make no order as· toco~ts_.Sd.K.S. Govinda Pillai,Judge Sd.K.A.Gangadhara Menon, Judge I
-16-21951
(rue copy)
R.$.3ls1.
•
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…