Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/1824/2002 of TARA CHANDRA MATHPAL Vs STATE and ORS on 28 December 2007
2002 Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J. Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Keeping in view the submissions made at bar, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. All the pending applications stand disposed of . (M.M.G., J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
WPSB 1824 of 2002
Hon’ble M.M. Ghildiyal, J.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Keeping in view the submissions
made at bar, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. All the applications stand disposed of.
pending
(M.M.G., J.)
28.12.2007VKS