Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/1230/2012 of ROSHAN LAL BANSAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANR on 31 December 2012
of 2012 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Rautela, AGA for the State. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the contents of First Information Report as well as considering the fact that three criminal cases,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
WPCRL No. 1230 of 2012
Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.
Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Rautela, AGA for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the contents of First Information Report as well as considering the fact that three criminal cases, that too under Section 13 of the Gambling Act pending against the petitioner, has been made a basis of instant complaint under Section 2/3 of the Gangster Act, so this Court is inclined to grant arrest stay to the petitioner.
Accordingly, it is directed that petitioner shall not be arrested during the course of investigation pursuant to FIR dated 14.12.2012 No. 403 of 2012 under Section 2/3 (Kha) (cha) of the U.P. Gangsters Act 1986, police station Kotwali District Dehradun provided he cooperates with the Investigating Agency.
This order will come to an end, as and when, any report is filed by the police, after culmination of investigation in the court concerned.
With the above directions, the petition as well as stay application no. 14014 of 2012 stand finally disposed of.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.)
31.12.2012