Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/1052/1999 of JAMLABHAI HARSINGBHAI MEDA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 21 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1052 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 1052 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- JAMLABHAI HARSINGBHAI MEDAVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: THROUGH JAIL for Petitioner Ms. Siddhi Talati for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 21/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
#. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent, perused the special criminal application and affidavit-in-reply.
#. The application filed by petitioner for his release on furlough leave came to be rejected by the competent authority. Hence this special criminal application before this court.
#. Leave has been rejected on the ground by appropriate authority that earlier he surrendered late by 903 days and after arrest by the police, when he was released on furlough leave. It has been stated that in addition to this there is another ground which prevailed with the authority to reject his application, and that is, while he was on furlough leave, he committed second murder and punishment of life imprisonment has been given by the Sessions Court, Dahod under its judgment dated 14th June 1999. In view of this fact, the authority has not committed any error in declining to grant furlough leave to the petitioner. The special criminal application is dismissed. Rule discharged.
.......
[sunil]