Kerala High Court

AS/7/1952 of KRISHNA KAMMATHI RAMACHANDRA KAMMATHI Vs VAMANA PAI RAYA PAI on 25 November 1954

L TPJ\V.Al'JCOPJ-~-COCHIN .AT ERNMCTJLA!✓.f. Present:- -k- The Hon1ble Bhri K.2. Koshi, Chief' Justice and The Hon'ble Shr·i Joseph Vithayattlil, Judge. A4. £.No.} or 295. o.s.no. 266 of 1122 on the file of Alleppe-y District Gou.rt. Appellant:- Defer&ant.

_il-

L

TPJ\V.Al'JCOPJ-~-COCHIN .AT ERNMCTJLA!! .f.

IN THE IIIGH·coUHT

Present:--k- The Hon[1]ble[B][h][r]i[ K][.][2][.][ K][o][s][h][i][,]Chief' Justiceand'Judge.The Honble[S][hr][·][i][ J][o][s][e][p][h][ V][i][t][ha][y][a][t][tl][i][l][,]

o.s.no. 266 of 1122 on the file of Alleppe-y District Gou.rt.

Appellant:-Defer&ant.

Krishna K.arnrnathi Rarnachand.ra Karnrnatbi of Ka1:Jra.rezhattll.J. iuadom,Va@oakum ±uri,Thuravoor Pdinjattumara Vadalua ±uri.

By .1\dvocate Sh.ri &.liarayanan potti.

Hesoondents:-Plaintif.fs 2 ano. o.

1~ varn;:111.a Pai 3.aya Pai of p:__mnavclildcal-mthu alias Kanachi.perampil.residinc st Velee_::>pra-:ubil Ko6emti.1.u.ruthu Mu.ri,Tl1.u.ravoo.r1Jac1al;:.:;:u Pa\::uth.y.

-12.Vamana Pai Viswanatha Pai ofcio.do.

By i\dvocate Sb.ri H. Varaoara ja Iyengar fo.r Hespondent 1.

1:rhis App2f;jll Suit having been finslly hea.rd on 25-11-1954, this cou.rt on the sa :n.e day delive.red the follm,iing:- JU2•

Page 1 of 2

The appeal relaces to the cosus isallowed to he@efenan-orteagein an action for@onand ne ccsshe has been ased opyvothe plaintiff-mo.rtgago.r.'I'he .reason given by the lowe.r cou.rt fo.r itsorder s s to costs is that· the mox•tgagee claimed more a mountsby way of.redeuptton price tha:tm·what he is .really- entitled.'l't1at no.r·tion of thetiIdecr·ee has not been appealed against, b[1]-1.t in the appeal from ttk.:con-ne cted suit fo.r arrears of renc under the lease-bac accompanying ne•mortgagewe ht1Ve held thst them.o.rtgage.e[I]s claim for lE yea.rs' a.r1"ea.rs•charged on the equtty of redemptio:n ,vas correct and alloned tl1.e appeal.In the ci.rc,..1mstanccs·,w~ consider that the most equitable ordc:::.r regarc}ingcostswill be to as"!:c bot11.~:;iC\es to bea.r their .respective costs, bothhere and in the lowe.r court and we decule a cco.rdlngly.The apeal ill stand allowed to this extent.l~s:Lndicated alreadywe[m][a][l][-][rn][ n][o]01.,de.r for costs of tLw appeal.

0. rde.r a ccotdingly.

-Sd/ K.T. Kosnit c.J.,Sd/- Joseph Vitt1~yathil, J.)rar,for·-,-,...,-: l•S G.,_.t'a _r •

( •r.rue Copy)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead