Kerala High Court
Crl.MC/8972/2017 of JIJO Vs STATE OF KERALA on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 Crl.MC.No. 8972 of 2017 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 200/2017 OF PALLITHOTTAM POLICE STATION , KOLLAM PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 8972 of 2017 () --------------------------- CRIME NO. 200/2017 OF PALLITHOTTAM POLICE STATION , KOLLAM
PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:---------------------- JIJO, AGED 27 YEARSS/O. EARNEST, ANUGRAHA NAGAR 118PALLITHOTTAM, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGEKOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.N.SUNIL JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/STATE:
----------------
STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORHIGH COURT OF KERALAREPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICEPALLITHOTTAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAMKOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-691 006.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.KAMAPPU
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
---------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No.8972 of 2017
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. The petitioner herein is the 2[nd] accused in Crime No.200 of2017 of Pallithottam Police Station registered alleging offencespunishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323,324, 307 read with Section 149 IPC. In this petition filed underSection 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the prayer is toissue necessary directions to the learned Magistrate to considerhis application for regular bail on the date of his surrender.
2. No specific orders are required to be issued to the learnedMagistrate. It is for the petitioner to surrender before thelearned Magistrate as expeditiously as possible. Needless tosay the application for bail, if any filed, with advance notice tothe concerned Prosecutor, shall be considered and disposed ofby the Court below, on merits, ideally on the date of surrenderitself.Magistrate. It is for the petitioner to surrender before thelearned Magistrate as expeditiously as possible. Needless tosay the application for bail, if any filed, with advance notice tothe concerned Prosecutor, shall be considered and disposed ofby the Court below, on merits, ideally on the date of surrenderitself.
This petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V.
JUDGE
sp/29/12/17
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge