Kerala High Court
WP(C)/42865/2022 of ABHIRAM P NAIR, REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND PRAKASHAN P Vs THE STATE OF KERALA ,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVT. on 30 December 2022
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 42865 OF 2022 PETITIONER: ABHIRAM P NAIR, AGED 17 YEARS REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND PRAKASHAN P REVATHI, VELLIKKOTH, AJANUR P.O, ANANDASHRAM,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944WP(C) NO. 42865 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
ABHIRAM P NAIR, AGED 17 YEARS REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND PRAKASHAN PREVATHI, VELLIKKOTH, AJANUR P.O, ANANDASHRAM, KANHANGAD, KASARAGOD, PIN - 671531BY ADVS.TITUS MANIP.A.JACOBBINNY THOMASSWAROOP A.P.
RESPONDENTS:
1THE STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVT.DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 6950012THE APPEAL COMMITTEE,REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMANDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KASARAGOD, REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2022-2023, PIN - 6711233THE GENERAL CONVENERKERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM CATAGORY VI KASARAGOD REVENUE DISTRICT (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION) KASARAGOD, PIN – 671123BY ADV SMT.ANIMA - GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 30.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2022
The petitioner was a participant in 'Desabhakthiganam'
competition in the District School Kalolsavam of KasaragodDistrict. The petitioner could not secure first prize.
2. The petitioner alleges that one of the Judges whoevaluated the event was the music teacher of the team which gotfirst prize in the event. During the performance of teams, thisJudge was giving signals in order to make undue advantage to theteam of his choice. The petitioner also relies on Ext.P1 newspaperreport.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government Pleader representing the respondents.
4. The allegation of the petitioner is one of bias. Bias has to be specifically pleaded and proved by the person making theallegation. In this writ petition, sufficient materials are not madeavailable to assume bias. This Court cannot pass any ordersbased on a newspaper report in the nature of Ext.P1.
The writ petition fails and it is dismissed.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 42865/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P-1TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PART OF THE NEWSPAPER REPORT APPEARED IN THE DAILY "VEEKSHANAM" KANNUR EDITION DATED 04-12-2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL