Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./10924/2011 of SIBI KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10924 of 2011() ------------------------------ (CRIME NO.1049/2011 OF ARANMULA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA) PETITIONERS: -------------------- 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 10924 of 2011()
------------------------------
(CRIME NO.1049/2011 OF ARANMULA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA)
PETITIONERS:
--------------------
1. SIBI KUMAR, S/O MOHAN KUMAR,
THOTTUPURAM VEEDU, ATTACHAKKAL, KONNI.
2. SREEJITH @ JITHE, S/O VIJAYAN, VIJAYABUVANAMVEEDU, IDAPARIYARAM, VIJAYABUVANAMVEEDU, IDAPARIYARAM, ELANTHOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.
3. TINU BALAN, S/0 BALAN,
THUNIDYIL PUTHANVEEDU, ELANTHOOR MEKKU MURI, ELANTHOOR MEKKU MURI, ELANTHOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.S.NAMBOOTHIRY
RESPONDENT:
---------------
STATE OF KERALA- REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.P.S.ABDUL KAREEM
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
SU
P.S.GOPINATHAN, J
----------------------------------
B.A.No.10924 of 2011
------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of December, 2011.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioners who are accused 2,3 and 4 in CrimeNo.1049/2011 of Aranmula Police Station for offencespunishable under Sections 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act are inthe custody since 14/12/2011.
2. Having heard either side, it is revealed that the quantity involved is only 1.5 litres and the 1st petitioner is astudent. In the above circumstance, I find it is quiteappropriate to release the petitioners on bail.
In the result, this petition is allowed. There will be a direction to the Judicial First Class Magistrate I,Pathanamthitta to release the petitioners on bail on executinga bond for Rs.15,000/- with two solvent sureties each for likeamount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate subject to thefollowing condition:
1) The petitioners shall report before the Magistrate as and when required.
su
P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE