Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./9518/2012 of POULOSE Vs THE STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 Bail Appl..No. 9518 of 2012 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO. 513 OF 2012 OF POZHIYOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED A14:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 9518 of 2012 () ------------------------------CRIME NO. 513 OF 2012 OF POZHIYOOR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED A14:---------------------- POULOSE, AGED 30 YEARS S/O. JOHNSON, MAVILAMANNADI VEEDU, KP XX/345 MAVILAKKADAVU, VENKADAMPU DESOM, KULATHOOR VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
---------------
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI C RASHEED
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P.BHAVADASAN, J
----------------------------------------- B.A No.9518 of 2012--------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
It is seen that similarly placed accused have been grantedrelief by order dated 1.10.2012 in B.A. No.7172/2012. Hence thisCourt finds no reason to take a different view in respect of thepetitioner. The petition is allowed as follows:
i)The petitioner shall surrender before theInvestigating Officer on or before 9.1.2013, who afterinterrogation shall produce him before the JFCM concernedand on an application for bail moved by the petitioner, thelearned Magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail on hisexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twentythousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum eachto the satisfaction of the said Court.
ii)The learned Magistrate shall ensure the identity ofthe sureties and also the veracity of the tax receipts beforegranting bail.
Iii)The petitioner shall appear before the InvestigatingOfficer concerned for interrogation as and when required byhim until further orders.
iv)The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt totamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence thewitness.
v)If any of the condition is violated, the bail grantedshall stand cancelled and the JFCM concerned, on beingsatisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings as areavailable to him in law.
P.BHAVADASAN
Judge