Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./7624/2006 of IMAL HARI Vs S.I.OF POLICE on 29 December 2006
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DECEMBER 2006 / 8TH POUSHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7624 of 2006(B) ------------------------------ Crime No.302/06 of Aroor Police Station : PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DECEMBER 2006 / 8TH POUSHA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 7624 of 2006(B)
------------------------------
Crime No.302/06 of Aroor Police Station
: PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:
---------------------------------------- BIMAL HARI, "SREEHARI", MUTTOM P.O., HARIPPAD.
BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT:
-------------------------
1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AROOR.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. JAI GEORGE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 29/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
M.N.Krishnan, J.
========================
B.A.No.7624 of 2006========================
Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2006.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.302 of 2006 of AroorPolice Station. Originally, a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Actwas filed and it was withdrawn and a fresh complaint was filed underSections 420, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 I.P.C.
2. Notice given to the Public Prosecutor. It is submitted that thepetitioner is not likely to go out of the station and further his custody isnot necessary and even the complainant has no definite case underSection 138 or the other Sections.
3. I feel that bail can be granted under Section 438 of Crl.P.C..Therefore, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted bailsubject to the following conditions:
(1) The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two BA 7624/06
-: 2 :-
solvent sureties each for the like amount to thesatisfaction of the Officer arresting him in the event ofhis arrest.
(2) The petitioner shall not intimidate theprosecution witnesses or attempt to interfere with theinvestigation.
(3) The order of bail shall be in force for a period ofsix weeks.
M.N. Krishnan,Judge.