Kerala High Court
WP(C)/42924/2022 of MUHAMMED BISHAHIR P Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 42924 OF 2022 PETITIONERS 1 MUHAMMED BISHAHIR P AGED 18 YEARS S/O IMBICHIKOYA P PULIKKAL (HO), KANNANKARA MOLINILAM ANZKUZHIKARA (P.O) POOVATTUPARAMBA,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 42924 OF 2022
PETITIONERS
1MUHAMMED BISHAHIR PAGED 18 YEARSS/O IMBICHIKOYA PPULIKKAL (HO), KANNANKARA MOLINILAMANZKUZHIKARA (P.O)POOVATTUPARAMBA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 6736012SREERAM V.VAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER VIDHYADHARANAMMA (HO) KALANGOTTUPARAMB KUTTIKKATTOOR (P.O)KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODEPIN – 6730083JOG SAJEEV CKAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER SAJEEVAN. C.KCHARUKESHI (HO), PULIKKALTHAZHAM (P.O), PERUMANNA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 6730264ABIN KPAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER BAIJU KPUNNATHOOR (HO), ANAKUZHIKARA (P.O), POOVATTU PARAMBA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 6736015ABHINAND KRISHNAN I.MAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER KRISHNADAS.NIDIYAPPATH METHAL, KUTTIKKATTOOR, KOZHIKODEPIN - 673008
6FASALUL HABIDAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER FAJILUL V.PKATTILAPURAM (HO)VELLIPARAMBA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 673008AGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER FAJILUL V.PKATTILAPURAM (HO)VELLIPARAMBA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 6730087MUHAMMED JINAN CAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER ABDUL AZEEZ C.VELLIPARAMBA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 673008AGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER ABDUL AZEEZ C.VELLIPARAMBA, KOZHIKODEPIN – 673008
8DEVANAND TAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER MANOJ TTHARUPPAYILILLAM, VIPANCHIKA,PERUMANNA ,KOZHIKODEPIN – 673026AGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER MANOJ TTHARUPPAYILILLAM, VIPANCHIKA,PERUMANNA ,KOZHIKODEPIN – 673026
9MUHAMMED HISHAM P.KAGED 17 YEARSREPRESENTED BYHIS FATHER HABEEBPADINJARAKANDI (HO)KUTTIKKATTOOR,KOZHIKODEPIN – 673008BY ADVS.NIKITA NAIR C.S.PRAVEEN.H.K.S.SMITHAT.T.SHANIBAM.V.VIPINDASAMAL DEV DG.HARIHARAN
RESPONDENTS
1DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATIONMANANCHIRA,KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001MANANCHIRA,KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001
2THE NODAL OFFICERKOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2022-23.ST ANTONY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,VATAKARAKOZHIKODEPIN – 673104’KOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2022-23.ST ANTONY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,VATAKARAKOZHIKODEPIN – 673104’
3THE APPEAL COMMITTEEREPRESENTED BY CHAIRMANKOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOLKALOLSAVAM 2022-23ST ANTONY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,VATAKARAKOZHIKODE-673104PIN – 673104REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMANKOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOLKALOLSAVAM 2022-23ST ANTONY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,VATAKARAKOZHIKODE-673104PIN – 673104
4THE GENERAL CONVENORKOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOLKALOLSAVAM 2022-23ST ANTONY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,VATAKARAKOZHIKODEPIN – 673104KOZHIKODE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOLKALOLSAVAM 2022-23ST ANTONY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,VATAKARAKOZHIKODEPIN – 673104
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.S SREEJITH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2022
The petitioners were participants in Kolkali Competition in the District School Kalolsavam of Kozhikode District. Thepetitioners could not secure the first prize and thus they are notin a position to participate in the State School Kalolsavam.
2. The petitioners state that the stage where Kolkali was performed, was deficient. The floor was slippery. The carpet wasnot properly laid. These factors affected the performance of thepetitioners.
3. This Court has considered the issue in W.P(C)
No.40794 of 2022 and connected cases and held that this Court cannot interfere in School Kalolsavams on such grounds andmake any adjudication on the infrastructure adequacy, as thisCourt is not equipped to do fact adjudication on those matters.
Following the judgment of this Court in W.P(C) No.40794of 2022 and connected cases, the writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
smm N. NAGARESH, JUDGE
A PPENDIX OF WP(C) 42924/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS