Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./10679/2011 of K.K.ALI @ MUHAMMED ALI Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10679 of 2011 ------------------------------------- ( CRIME NO. 1077 /2011 OF THE HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. GOPINATHAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 10679 of 2011
-------------------------------------
( CRIME NO. 1077 /2011 OF THE HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT )
.......................................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
----------------------------------
K.K. ALI @ MUHAMMED ALI,S/O. MUHAMMED, AGED 27 YEARS, RUMEESA MANZIL, KANDATHIL, KALLURAVI.
BY ADV. SRI. SUNNY MATHEW
RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT:
--------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI. R. RANJITH
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DST
P.S.GOPINATHAN, J
----------------------------------
------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of December, 2011.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner is reported to be the 9[th] accused in CrimeNo.1077/2011 of the Hosdurg Police Station for offences punishableunder Sections 143, 147, 148, 452,324, 307, 436 and 153A r/w 149 ofIPC. Ever since his apprehension on 15/11/2011, he is in custody. Torelease him on bail, this bail application is filed.
It is seen that by order in Bail Application No.9952/2011, thisCourt granted bail to the other accused . In the above circumstance,I find no reason to disallow the same relief to the petitioner.
In the result, this application is allowed. There will be adirection to the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class I, Hosdurg torelease the petitioner on bail on executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- eachwith two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of theMagistrate on the following conditions:
a)The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of the First the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Hosdurg. If the passport was seized by the Police or if the petitioner do not have a passport, an Police or if the petitioner do not have a passport, an affidavit sworn to by him to that effect shall be filed before the learned Magistrate. before the learned Magistrate.
b)The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9.A.M. And 11 A.M on all Mondays and Thursdays for a period of one month and thereafter, on all Mondays till the final report is filed Officer between 9.A.M. And 11 A.M on all Mondays and Thursdays for a period of one month and thereafter, on all Mondays till the final report is filed or until further orders.
B.A.No.10679 of 2011 2
c)The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required.Officer for interrogation as and when required.
d)Petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police officer.any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police officer.
P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE