Uttarakhand High Court
BA2/60/2009 of KAMAL GUPTA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. R.S. Sammal, Adv. for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant stated at bar that the present bail application has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the trial has now been concluded and the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BA2 No.60/09 Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
Mr. R.S. Sammal, Adv. for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant stated at bar that the present bail application has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the trial has now been concluded and the applicant has been acquitted. In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
(D.V., J.)
31.12.2009
Rajeev Dang