Kerala High Court
WP(C)/21171/2007 of KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs A.SANKARAN NAIR on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C).No. 21171 of 2007 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
WP(C).No. 21171 of 2007 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE SECRETARY,
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,VYDHYUTHI BHAVANAM
PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN(SR.)SC,KSEB SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. A. SANKARAN NAIR,
AYAMATTIL HOUSE, P.O. PANAGAD, BALUSSERY
KOZHIKODE
2. THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE
PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT (DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER)
KOZHIKODE.
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, KOZHIKODE. (THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE
PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT).
R2-3 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JAMES MATHEW KADAVANR.1 BY ADV. SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V. CHITAMBARESH, J
--------------------------------
WP(C) NO. 21171 OF 2007
------------------------------------
Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Ext. P2 order directing payment of gratuity as affirmedin Ext.P3 order is under challenge. It is now submitted thatthe entire amount due as gratuity has already been disbursedto the first respondent. The petitioners are not interested inpursuing the writ petition therefore.
The Writ Petition is hence dismissed as infructuous.
ncd
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE