Kerala High Court

OP(C)/4447/2012 of CHANDRAN PAROLIL Vs SECRETARY,THENNALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD on 31 December 2012

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 OP(C).No. 4447 of 2012 (O) -------------------------- ARC.858/2006 of MUNSIFF'S COURT,PARAPPANANGADI ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH

MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934

OP(C).No. 4447 of 2012 (O)

--------------------------

ARC.858/2006 of MUNSIFF'S COURT,PARAPPANANGADI

----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-----------------------

1. CHANDRAN PAROLIL, S/O.CHOYI, NAMBRA AMSOM , CHERUMUKKU DESOM, TIRURANGADI TALUK, POST CHERUMUKKU, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. JALEEL VADAKKANPARAMBIL, S/O.HAMSA, NAMBRA AMSOM, CHERUMUKKU DESOM,TIRURANGADI TALUK, POST CHERUMUKKU, MALAP[PURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------

SECRETARY, THENNALA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, POST VALAKKULAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676300.

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

NS

OP(C).No. 4447 of 2012 (O)

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION NO.305/2011 DATED 01-09-2011 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANAGADI AND ITS PROCEEDINGS. MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANAGADI AND ITS PROCEEDINGS.

EXT.P2 : COPY OF COUNTER IN EP NO.305/2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, PARAPPANANGADI DATED 24-01-2012. PARAPPANANGADI DATED 24-01-2012.

EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE EVIDENCE OF PW1 IN EP NO. 305/2011 OF MUNSIOFF COURT PARAPPANANGADI DATED 23-02-2012 . PARAPPANANGADI DATED 23-02-2012 .

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS ' : NIL

/ TRUE COPY /

P.A. TO JUDGE

THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.=====================

Original Petition (civil)) No. 4447 of 2012 ==============================Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission towithdraw the original petition for the reason that the executionpetition is dismissed.

2. Permission is granted.

Resultantly, the original petition is dismissed as withdrawnwithout prejudice to other rights if any of the petitioner.

smv

Sd/-

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE

//True copy//P.A. To Judge

O.P.(C). No. of -: 2 :-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead