Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./9513/2012 of SATHEESH.P Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 Bail Appl..No. 9513 of 2012 () ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.837/2012 OF NILESHWAR POLICE STATION, KASARGOD DISTRICT. .........
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 9513 of 2012 ()
---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.837/2012 OF NILESHWAR POLICE STATION, KASARGOD DISTRICT.
.........
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
------------------------------------
SATHEESH.P, AGED 32 YEARS. S/O. RAGHAVAN, ANANTHANPALLA, OZHINHAVALAPPU P.O. HOSDURG TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.A.ARUNKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT :
----------------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER (CRIME NO. 837/2012 OF NILESHWAR POLICE STATION) KASARGOD DISTRICT-671314.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P.BHAVADASAN, J
-----------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
In the light of the fact that in the connected crime factshave been stated which also resulted in the registration of CrimeNo. 837 of 2012 of Nileswaram Police Station, Kasargod District,out of which the present bail application arise, it is unnecessaryto repeat the facts again. In the other crime anticipatory bail wasgranted to the accused.
2. Considering the nature of the allegations against thepetitioner and also the fact that in Crime No.835 of 2012anticipatory bail has been granted, there is no reason to rejectthe prayer in this case. Petition is allowed as follows:
i)The petitioner may surrender before the courtconcerned on or before 9.1.2013 with due notice to APP,and the court, on application being moved by thepetitioner, shall release him on bail on his executing abond for Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) withtwo solvent sureties each for the like sum to thesatisfaction of the court concerned.
ii) The court shall ensure the identity of the suretiesand the veracity of the tax receipts, before granting bail.
iii) The petitioner shall appear before theInvestigating Officer for interrogation as and whenrequired by him.
B.A No.9513 of 2012
iv) The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt totamper with the evidence and influence or try to influencethe witnesses.
v) If any of the condition is violated, the bail grantedshall stand cancelled and the court concerned, of beingsatisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings asare available in law.
P.BHAVADASAN Judge