Kerala High Court

WP(C)/38070/2008 of THOMAS K.C. Vs THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS on 26 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38070 of 2008(F) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- THOMAS K.C.S/O.CHEEKU,KARIMATHURUTHY ' HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA P.O. N.PARAVOOR,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930

WP(C).No. 38070 of 2008(F)

--------------------------

PETITIONER(S):

---------------

THOMAS K.C.S/O.CHEEKU,KARIMATHURUTHY '

HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA P.O. N.PARAVOOR,

ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN

SRI.NIREESH MATHEW

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE

OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE ASST.EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THRISSUR.

3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, THRISSUR

4. DIXON D. THOTTATHIL, S/O.DAVIS,

THOTTATHIL HOUSE, ANALUR VILLAGE,

MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT,(LICENSEE

OF TODDY SHOPS IN GROUP NOS.1 & V OF ANTHIKKAD

EXCISE RANGE THRO THE C.I. OF EXCISE, THRISSUR)

5. B.M.S. CHETHU THOZHILALI UNION,

THRISSUR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. SANDESH RAJA

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 26/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

-----------------------

W.P.(C).No. 38070 OF 2008

------------------------

Dated this the 26[th] day of December, 2008.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

In this writ petition petitioner complains that the 4[th]respondent, the licensee of the Toddy Shops in Group Nos.I and V

in Anthicad Excise Range, Thrissur Division, has violated Rule 7 (23)of the Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 and that therefore thesaid license is liable for cancellation. Urging this contentionpetitioner has submitted Exts.P2 and P3 before the 1[st] respondentand complaint is that orders have not been passed on therepresentations submitted.

2. If as stated above, Exts.P2 and P3 have been receivedby the 1[st] respondent, the 1[st] respondent shall necessarily takeaction thereon with notice to the 4[th] respondent.

3. Therefore writ petition is disposed of directing the 1[st]respondent to take appropriate action on Exts.P2 and P3 withnotice to the 4[th] respondent licensee.

This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,within 6 weeks of a production of a copy of this judgment.

(ANTONY DOMINIC)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead