Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1464/2013 of Vijendra Vs State Of Uttarakhand on 30 December 2013
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital: the 30th day of December, 2013 1st Bail Application No.1464 of 2013 Order on the Bail Application: CRIMINAL SIDE Vijendra S/o Becho Lal @ beche lal R/o Milav Jaidpur, P.S. Virasatganj, District Udham Singh Nagar.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital: the 30[th] day of December, 2013 1st Bail Application No.1464 of 2013
Order on the Bail Application:
CRIMINAL SIDE
Vijendra
S/o Becho Lal @ beche lal R/o Milav Jaidpur, P.S. Virasatganj, District Udham Singh Nagar.
………Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand …… Opposite Party
Arising out of F.I.R. No. 333 of 2013, Under Section- 397, 394 and 411 of I.P.C., Police Station Rudrapur, District-Udham Singh Nagar.
Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.
Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Advocate for the
applicant.
Mr. R.K. Sah, A.G.A. with Mr. K.S. Rangarh, Brief Holder for the State.
Counter affidavit filed in the Court today. Same is accepted on record.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Applicant Vijendra, who is in jail in connection with F.I.R. No. 333 of 2013, Under Section- 397, 394
and 411 of I.P.C., Police Station Rudrapur, District-Udham Singh Nagar, has sought his release on bail.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present crime. He submitted that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He submitted that the applicant has no previous criminal history. He argued that the co-accused with similar role has already been granted bail.
Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage.
The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Vijendra be released on bail, on executing personal bond of ` 50,000/- and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate.
(V.K. Bist, J.)
Arpan 30.12.2013