Kerala High Court
WP(C)/37001/2009 of L.K. KUNHABDULLA AND ORS Vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ORS on 30 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37001 of 2009(U) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. L.K.KUNHABDULLA,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 37001 of 2009(U)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. L.K.KUNHABDULLA, S/O.ABDULLA,
CHEEMENI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
2. P.MUSTHAFA, S/O.LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN,
CHEEMENI VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
3. K.M.ABDUL JABBAR,
S/O.MOHD KUNHI, CHEEMENI VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.A.L.GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
2. DY. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
KANHANGAD.
3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CHEEMENI POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
4. MUSTHAFA, S/O.LATE ABDUL RAHIMAN,
PETTIKUNDU, CHEEMENI VILLAGE,
HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
S. Siri Jagan & P.N. Ravindran, JJ.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
W. P (C) No. 37001 of 2009
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dated this, the 30[th] December, 2009.J U D G M E N T
S. Siri Jagan, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writpetition is not pressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed asnot pressed.
Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.
Sd/- P.N. Ravindran, Judge.
Tds/
[TRUE COPY]
P.S TO JUDGE.