Uttarakhand High Court
CRLR/1798/1990 of MAHIPAL SINGH Vs STATE AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2003
No. 427 of 2001 (Old No. 1798/1990) Hon’ble P.C.Verma, A.C. J. Heard Sri Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the revisionist and learned Government Advocate. This is the revision against the judgment and order dated 03.08.90 passed by Sessions Judge, Uttarkashi in criminal appeal No. 10 of 1990
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Criminal Revision No. 427 of 2001 (Old No. 1798/1990)
Hon’ble P.C.Verma, A.C. J.
Heard Sri Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate for the revisionist and learned Government Advocate.
This is the revision against the judgment and order dated 03.08.90 passed by Sessions Judge, Uttarkashi in criminal appeal No. 10 of 1990 by which the appeal was allowed and the conviction of opposite party No. 2 and sentence dated 12.4.90 u/s 420 I.P.C. was set aside.
I have perused the above judgment. In my opinion, the judgment does not suffer from any infirmity and the revision, therefore, lacks merit.
In view of the above, the revision is dismissed.
(P.C. Verma, A.C.J.) Dt. 30.12.2003