Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1326/2002 of VEDPAL and ORS. Vs STATE on 20 December 2002
COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Original Jurisdiction Dated: Nainital the 20th day of December, 2002 Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1326of 2002 Order on the Bail Application CRIMINAL SIDE (1) Ved Pal son of Phool Singh, (2) Brijpal Singh son of Phool Singh, both residents of village
Original Jurisdiction
Dated: Nainital the 20th day of December, 2002
Criminal Misc. Bail Application Number 1326of 2002
CRIMINAL SIDE
Order on the Bail Application
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
(1) Ved Pal son of Phool Singh, (2) Brijpal Singh son of Phool Singh, both residents of village Naurata, P.S. Indri, District Karnal Haryana, (3) Rajendra son of Vijender Singh, r/o village Ghisarpuri, P.S. Indiri District Karnal, Haryana, (4) Setha son of Shrichand, r/o village Garhishyam, P.S Kandhla, District Muzzafarnagar, (5) Isham Singh son of Jayveera, r/o village Garhishyam, P.S Kandhla, District Muzzafarnagar (6) Yashpal alias Guruji son of Ratna, r/o village Ghasoli, P.S Kandla, District Muzzafarnagar r/o village Ghisarpuri, P.S. Indiri District Karnal, Haryana, (4) Setha son of Shrichand, Jayveera, r/o village Garhishyam, P.S Kandhla, District Muzzafarnagar (6) Yashpal
…………………..Applicant(s)
Versus
State of Uttaranchal. ……………….. Opposite Party _________________________________________________________________________
Arising out of- Case crime no. 76 of 2002, Under sections 3 (2) II, U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial (Prevention) Activities Act, P.S. G.R.P., Hardwar, District Hardwar _________________________________________________________________________
By the Court
Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant-accused and the learned Government Advocate.
The applicants-accused are on bail in two cases each pending against them. There is no previous conviction to the credit of the applicants and considering this fact, there are reasonable grounds to accept at this state the argument that the applicants have not committed the offence and there is no likelihood of their involving themselves in similar activity in future, if released on bail. Considering this aspect, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail.
Let the applicants (1) Ved Pal son of Phool Singh, (2) Brijpal Singh son of Phool Singh, both residents of village Naurata, P.S. Indri, District Karnal Haryana, (3) Rajendra son of Vijender Singh, r/o village Ghisarpuri, P.S. Indiri District Karnal, Haryana, (4) Setha son of Shrichand, r/o village Garhishyam, P.S Kandhla, District Muzzafarnagar, (5) Isham Singh son of Jayveera, r/o village Garhishyam, P.S Kandhla, District Muzzafarnagar (6) Yashpal alias Guruji son of Ratna, r/o village Ghasoli, P.S Kandla, District Muzzafarnagar be released on bail in case crime no. 76 of 2002, under section 3 (2) II, U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial (Prevention) Activities Act, P.S. G.R.P., Hardwar, District Hardwar on their each filing a personal bond and adequate sureties each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Hardwar.
Isham Singh son of Jayveera, r/o village Garhishyam, P.S Kandhla, District II, U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial (Prevention) Activities Act, P.S. G.R.P., (Irshad Hussain, J.)