Kerala High Court
WP(C)/35223/2011 of JINO VARGHESE Vs SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR on 30 December 2011
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/9TH POUSHA 1933 WPC.No. 35223 of 2011 (C) PETITIONER(S) 1 JINO VARGHESE, S/O.K.D.VARGHESE KOTTUR VELLATTUKARA HOUSE ENAMAKKAL P.O., PIN: 680 510 THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2 ALKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/9TH POUSHA 1933
WPC.No. 35223 of 2011 (C)
PETITIONER(S)
1 JINO VARGHESE, S/O.K.D.VARGHESE
KOTTUR VELLATTUKARA HOUSE
ENAMAKKAL P.O., PIN: 680 510
THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2 ALKA J.NAMBIAR, D/O.JANARDHANA NAMBIAR
KUPPUSWAMY STREET, PAZHAVANTHANGAL
CHENNAI - 600 114, TAMIL NADU.
BY ADV.SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN
SRI.SAIJO HASSANSRI.BENOJ C.AUGUSTINESRI.SEBIN THOMASSRI.RAJAN VELLOTHSRI.PRATHAP PILLAISRI.I.J.AUGUSTINESMT.NOOHU KUNJU SAHIBSMT.KASTHURI.JSMT.SWATHY DAS
RESPONDENT(S)
1 SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR
COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR - 680003.
2 THE SUB REGISTRAR, SRO VADAKKUMKARA
VELLANGALLUR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680662.
3 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE LAW SECRETARY
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-12-2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS:NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
BKA
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
------------------------------------------ WP(C) NO. 35223 OF 2011
------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioners are seeking for a direction to the 1[st ]
respondent to process Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioners in accordance with the Cochin Christian Civil Marriage Act. The 1[st] petitioner actually falls within the area of erstwhile Cochin State.
2. There will be a direction to the 1[st] respondent to process the original of Ext.P1 application and register the marriage of the petitioners, if all other conditions are satisfied. The petitioners will produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of the judgment for compliance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,JUDGE
bka/-