Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/45/2005 of LALA RAM Vs B.S.N.L. and ORS. on 26 December 2007
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 45 of 2005 (S/B) Lala Ram s/o Sri Dauji Ram, Presently posted as Senior Account Officer in the office of DGM, Telecom Project (Northern Telecom Project), Dehradun …… Petitioner Versus 1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited ( A Govt. of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 45 of 2005 (S/B)
Lala Ram s/o Sri Dauji Ram, Presently posted as Senior Account Officer in the office of DGM, Telecom Project (Northern Telecom Project), Dehradun
…… Petitioner Versus
1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (A Govt. of India enterprise) through Chief General Manager, Northern Telecom Projects, Eastern Court complex, Janpath, New Delhi. (A Govt. of India enterprise) through Chief General Manager, Northern Telecom Projects, Eastern Court complex, Janpath, New Delhi. 2. Deputy General Manager, Telecom Projects, N.T.P. Dehradun. N.T.P. Dehradun. 3. Chief Accounts Officer (F.A.) B.S.N.L. Northern Telecom Projects, Eastern Court Complex, Janpath, New Delhi. Northern Telecom Projects, Eastern Court Complex, Janpath, New Delhi. 4. Deputy General Manager (Finance) Office of Chief General Manager Telecom Projects, N.T.P. Eastern Court complex, Office of Chief General Manager Telecom Projects, N.T.P. Eastern Court complex, New Delhi ………. Respondents
………
Sri B.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Sri Pradeep Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Sri V.B.S. Negi, Advocate for the respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Rajeev Gupta, C. J. Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.
RAJEEV GUPTA, C. J. (Oral)
Sri B.P.Nautiyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Sri Pradeep Joshi, Advocate on behalf of Sri V.B.S. Negi, Advocate for the respondents.
2. Sri B.P. Nautiyal, the learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the substantial amendments required to be made in the writ petition, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty of filling another writ petition for the reliefs sought by the petitioner in this writ petition and other ancillary reliefs.
3. Permission granted.
4. With the above liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(J.C.S.Rawat, J.) (Rajeev Gupta, C. J.)
26.12.2007 26.12.2007
A