Uttarakhand High Court
C482/1373/2012 of DELIP MISHRA AND ORS Vs VINITA on 31 December 2012
1373 of 2012 Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J. Compounding Application No. 1674 of 2012 Mr. Amish Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Lalit Tiwari, Advocate for respondent. Petitioner no. 1 Delip Mishra, petitioner no. 2 Sonu Mishra, respondent Vinita and Ganesh Chandra Arya, uncle of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Compounding Application No. 1674 of 2012
Mr. Amish Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Lalit Tiwari, Advocate for respondent.
Petitioner no. 1 Delip Mishra, petitioner no. 2 Sonu Mishra, respondent Vinita and Ganesh Chandra Arya, uncle of Vinita are present personally in the Court and they are identified by their respective counsel.
A complaint no. 323 of 2007 was filed by Vinita in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ranikhet against as many as seven persons, who all are petitioners herein. In the said case, order of cognizance was passed on 04.08.2007 against all the accused persons under Sections 323, 420, 504, 493, 495, 109 IPC.
Learned counsel for the parties have apprised this Court that trial has still not commenced and parties have entered into a compromise.
Ms. Vinita informed this Court that she has received all her dues from Delip Mishra, with whom she married under the impression that he was a bachelor.
In the above facts and circumstances, compounding application is allowed. Impugned order of cognizance and entire proceedings of criminal case no. 323 of 2007 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ranikhet, District Almora are hereby quashed.
This petition stands disposed of.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.)
31.12.2012