Kerala High Court
Crl.MC/1526/2022 of SHABEER @ SHABBA Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2022
OF 2022 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944 CRL.MC NO. 1526 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: 1 SHABEER @ SHABBA AGED 28 YEARS VAZHAVELIPARAMBU HOUSE, THANGAL NAGAR, PALLURUTHY, EDAKOCHI
CRL.MC NO. 1526 OF 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944CRL.MC NO. 1526 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
1SHABEER @ SHABBAAGED 28 YEARSVAZHAVELIPARAMBU HOUSE, THANGAL NAGAR,PALLURUTHY, EDAKOCHI VILLAGE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 6820062ANIL @ ANI P.KAGED 44 YEARSPALLICHIRA HOUSE,PALLURUTHY P.O.,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 6820063NAIJIL VARGHESE P.AAGED 29 YEARSHOUSE NO.23/988G, PALITHARA HOUSE,PONNUTHARA JUNCTION, THEKKUMBHAGOM,PALLURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 6820064NISHAD V.NAGED 30 YEARSARAKKAL NIKARTHIL HOUSE, MOHAMMED PALLI ROAD, THANGAL NAGAR,PALLURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682006BY ADVS.A.C.DEVYK.R.RAMISH
RESPONDENT/S:
1STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, CRL.MC NO. 1526 OF 20222HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 6820312NOUFALAGED 41 YEARSHOUSE NO.XXIII/672, PALLURUTHY,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682006
OTHER PRESENT:
PP C SEEMA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON30.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J--------------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No1526 of 2022-------------------------------------- Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
After arguing for sometime, the counsel for the petitionersubmitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this Crl.M.Cbecause he wants to produce certain additional documents.
Therefore, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn withliberty to file it again, if there is any fresh cause of action.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
SKS